李琳, 李称鑫, 李小萌. 评价系统视域下的经济话语研究——基于国外学界对中国经济评价的文本挖掘分析[J]. 外国语, 2023, 46(3): 57-69.
引用本文: 李琳, 李称鑫, 李小萌. 评价系统视域下的经济话语研究——基于国外学界对中国经济评价的文本挖掘分析[J]. 外国语, 2023, 46(3): 57-69.
LI Lin, LI Chenxin, LI Xiaomeng. On the Economic Discourse Research from the Perspective of Appraisal Theory: Text Mining Analysis on Evaluation of China’s Economy in Foreign Academia[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2023, 46(3): 57-69.
Citation: LI Lin, LI Chenxin, LI Xiaomeng. On the Economic Discourse Research from the Perspective of Appraisal Theory: Text Mining Analysis on Evaluation of China’s Economy in Foreign Academia[J].Journal of Foreign Languages, 2023, 46(3): 57-69.

评价系统视域下的经济话语研究——基于国外学界对中国经济评价的文本挖掘分析

On the Economic Discourse Research from the Perspective of Appraisal Theory: Text Mining Analysis on Evaluation of China’s Economy in Foreign Academia

  • 摘要:探究国外学界对中国经济的整体认知和态度,为我们廓清国际舆论提供理据,为建构中国对外经济话语体系,提升中国对外经济话语传播能力提供参考。本研究以评价系统为基础,提出新的三维评价分析框架,采用主题建模和文本挖掘方法考察国外学界对中国经济的评价。研究发现:1)国外学界主要关注"'一带一路’倡议""中国金融改革""中国经济改革""中国的全球经济角色"和"中美经济关系"五个经济领域;2)国外学界对各个领域的评价存在显著差异,对"中国经济改革""中国的全球经济角色"和"'一带一路’倡议"持偏积极态度,对"中国金融改革"和"中美经济关系"持偏消极态度;3)国外学界评价各个经济领域所使用的态度词汇存在显著差异。

    Abstract:This study aims to investigate the overall awareness and attitude of foreign academia towards China’s economy, providing a rationale and reference for clarifying international public opinion, constructing China’s foreign economic discourse system, and improving China’s ability to promote its foreign economic discourse.Based on the Appraisal Theory, a new three-dimensional evaluation analysis framework was proposed, and topic modeling and text mining methods were adopted to investigate the evaluation of China’s economy in foreign academia.The study yielded the following findings: (1) Foreign academia mainly focuses on five economic fields: the Belt and Road Initiative, China’s financial reform, China’s economic reform, China’s role in global economy, and Sino-US economic relations.(2) There are significant differences in the evaluation of these five economic fields by foreign academia.A more positive attitudes were found towards China’s economic reform, China’s role in global economy, and the Belt and Road Initiative, while a little bit negative attitudes were found towards China’s financial reform and Sino-US economic relations.(3) Significant differences were found in the attitude lexica resources used by foreign academia to evaluate these five economic fields.

/

    返回文章
    返回