王斌华, 高非. 口译的意识形态研究——口译研究的拓展[J]. 外国语, 2020, 43(3): 89-101.
引用本文: 王斌华, 高非. 口译的意识形态研究——口译研究的拓展[J]. 外国语, 2020, 43(3): 89-101.
WANG Binhua, GAO Fei. Exploring the Ideological Dimension of Interpreting Activities-Towards Expansion of Interpreting Studies[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2020, 43(3): 89-101.
Citation: WANG Binhua, GAO Fei. Exploring the Ideological Dimension of Interpreting Activities-Towards Expansion of Interpreting Studies[J].Journal of Foreign Languages, 2020, 43(3): 89-101.

口译的意识形态研究——口译研究的拓展

Exploring the Ideological Dimension of Interpreting Activities-Towards Expansion of Interpreting Studies

  • 摘要:近20年来,国内的口译行业经历了职业化发展过程,口译教学也经历了专业化发展过程。但同时,社会对口译的认识却愈加"工具化",即视译员为语言转换的专业工具;口译教学的专业化强调以口译技巧训练为中心,实际上也在译员群体自身强化了这种"工具化"的认识。在上述背景下,有必要厘清口译的认识论,口译不仅仅是即时的双语加工和复杂的认知处理行为,而且是人际和跨语言文化的中介协调活动,还是一种在历史和现实中往往起到重要作用的社会—文化活动。口译研究在经历了以关注认知处理过程为中心的科学化发展阶段后,对口译作为人际和跨语言文化的中介协调活动和社会—文化活动的意识形态特质关注不够。本文从口译的多维认识论入手,初步建构口译意识形态研究的框架:揭示口译与意识形态的关系;梳理口译意识形态研究的对象;探索口译意识形态研究的方法,并分析典型的研究案例。

    Abstract:Against the background that interpreting is increasingly perceived only as a tool of language transfer following the professionalization of interpreting and its training in China in the past two decades, this article proceeds from the multi-dimensional epistemology of interpreting which argues that interpreting is not only a bilingual cognitive processing behaviour, but also an inter-personal and cross-cultural mediation activity and a socio-cultural activity. It points out the defect of interpreting studies in focusing on cognitive process(ing) while overlooking the dimensions of inter-personal and cross-cultural mediation and socio-cultural and ideological manipulation. After uncovering the covert relations between interpreting and ideologies, this article proposes a framework for exploring the ideological dimension in interpreting activities, which outlines the research themes and methods. Relevant examples are analysed in illustration of various themes and methods.

/

    返回文章
    返回