胡翠娥. “殊德之仁”与“全德之仁”——海外译“仁”及其对儒家思想的认识之发展[J]. 外国语, 2020, 43(1): 94-101.
引用本文: 胡翠娥. “殊德之仁”与“全德之仁”——海外译“仁”及其对儒家思想的认识之发展[J]. 外国语, 2020, 43(1): 94-101.
HU Cui'e. “Ren” as a Special Virtue or a Totality of Virtues: A Discourse on the English Translation of “Ren” and Development of Confucian Studies[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2020, 43(1): 94-101.
Citation: HU Cui'e. “Ren” as a Special Virtue or a Totality of Virtues: A Discourse on the English Translation of “Ren” and Development of Confucian Studies[J].Journal of Foreign Languages, 2020, 43(1): 94-101.

“殊德之仁”与“全德之仁”——海外译“仁”及其对儒家思想的认识之发展

“Ren” as a Special Virtue or a Totality of Virtues: A Discourse on the English Translation of “Ren” and Development of Confucian Studies

  • 摘要:对《论语》中"仁"的翻译直接体现出英语世界对孔子及儒学创新性的认识和定位。海外译"仁"不辨"殊德"与"全德",源于或不识仁为儒学中心,或不审后世理学家言仁之辩。从19世纪到当代,海外译"仁"各有所重,它不仅是翻译,更是一种思想活动,映射出海外对儒家哲学思想自身以及与西方文化关系的认识变化,同时儒家思想在不断汇入世界资源,其历久弥新的根源在于它内在的可适应性。

    Abstract:Translations of the "ren" in the Analectsreflect how the English world conceptualizes Confucius and Confucianism.Most translations have not drawn a distinction between "ren" as a special virtue and "ren" as a totality of virtues, mainly because they neither recognize "ren" as the core of Confucianism nor have the knowledge of the discourses on "ren" by neo-Confucian scholars.From 19th century till now, "ren" has been rendered variously, an intellectual activity that mirrors how the western world looks at Confucianism and its relation to the West.At the same time, Confucianism has outlived global interpretations due to its intrinsic adaptability.

/

    返回文章
    返回