柳俊. 东南亚语言区域的双及物结构类型及其成因[J]. 外国语, 2019, 42(4): 35-45.
引用本文: 柳俊. 东南亚语言区域的双及物结构类型及其成因[J]. 外国语, 2019, 42(4): 35-45.
LIU Jun. The Ditransitives in Southeast Asia Area: Typology and motivation[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2019, 42(4): 35-45.
Citation: LIU Jun. The Ditransitives in Southeast Asia Area: Typology and motivation[J].Journal of Foreign Languages, 2019, 42(4): 35-45.

东南亚语言区域的双及物结构类型及其成因

The Ditransitives in Southeast Asia Area: Typology and motivation

  • 摘要:在区域类型学框架下,本文着眼于东南亚语言区域的双及物结构类型。经统计推导出10条共性。它们表现为基本语序、"接事-客事"语序(RT语序)、结构、标记性和事件发展方向性之间的多维关联性。RT语序的倾向性,在动词居中(V2)与动词居末(V3)语言和方言中相反(U SEA1),在"双宾构式—附属语标记结构—连动式"结构连续统和"R型—中性—T型"标记性连续统上渐变(U SEA5和U SEA6),在顺逆向事件编码上时同时异(U SEA4和U SEA9)。这些共性的5条结构、功能和认知成因互相竞争,它们的总体效应量排序为:核心VP紧缩原则>观念距离象似性原则>顺序象似性原则>可别度领前原则>T-R连动式原则(U SEA10)。

    Abstract:In light of areal typology, ditransitives in Southeast Asia Area typologically fall into 10 areal universals (thereafter U SEA) in the statistical sense.These U SEAs reveal multiple correlations among VO ordering, RT ordering, structures, markedness and the direction of event evolution.Specifically, the preference of RT ordering is reversed in V2 and V3 languages & dialects (U SEA1), gradually reversed along the structural continuum, i.e."DOC-ApOC-SVC" (U SEA5), and the markedness continuum, i.e."R-neutral-T" (U SEA6), flipping on the coding isomorphism of inbound and outbound events (U SEA4 & U SEA9).But right in the back room, there are 5 structural, functional and cognitive competing motivations in effect in a consecutive ranking as "MiVP > Conceptual Distance Iconicity > Evolving Chain Iconicity > Identification>[T-R] SVC" (U SEA10).

/

    返回文章
    返回