钟彩顺. 基于元音共振峰的跨语言司法语音比对研究[J]. 外国语, 2019, 42(1): 61-71.
引用本文: 钟彩顺. 基于元音共振峰的跨语言司法语音比对研究[J]. 外国语, 2019, 42(1): 61-71.
ZHONG Caishun. Cross-Linguistic Forensic Voice Comparison Based on Vowel Formants[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2019, 42(1): 61-71.
Citation: ZHONG Caishun. Cross-Linguistic Forensic Voice Comparison Based on Vowel Formants[J].Journal of Foreign Languages, 2019, 42(1): 61-71.

基于元音共振峰的跨语言司法语音比对研究

Cross-Linguistic Forensic Voice Comparison Based on Vowel Formants

  • 摘要:语音比对是司法语音鉴定的一种重要技术手段,但目前仅有单语语音比对。本研究通过语音实验,探讨基于元音共振峰的跨语言语音比对的有效性。结果显示,50%以上的受试可通过似然率进行有效识别。根据似然比对数的损耗度,/i/_f 2,/ə/_f 1和/u/_f 1三个特征符合似然法语音比对的效度要求。在参照组语言选择上,/i/_f 2和/ə/_f 1既可用汉语,也可用英语,但/u/_f 1只有用英语才有效。受试群体的汉英语音相似度对跨语言语音比对有影响,但无显著关联。本研究最后探讨了如何就变量选用、参照选择及实际应用等方面进一步深化跨语言司法语音比对的研究。

    Abstract:Voice comparison is a useful technique for forensic speaker identification.However, there is only within-language speaker identification so far.This research conducts a phonetic experiment to explore the validity of cross-linguistic voice comparison based on vowel formants.The results show that likelihood values derived from this experiment are able to identify over 50% of the tested subjects.The log-likelihood ratio costs reveal that/i/_f 2,/ə/_f 1and/u/_f 1are the only three acoustic features that can meet the validity requirements for likelihood approach to voice comparison.As to the language used by the reference population, both Chinese and English are valid for/i/_f 2and/ə/_f 1, while only English is good for/u/_f 1.Finally, some proposals are made on how to strengthen cross-linguistic forensic voice comparison by exploring further into the choice of phonetic features, the selection of reference population and the application of forensic voice comparison.

/

    返回文章
    返回