吴建明. 类型学视角下的“自己”义形式和功能[J]. 外国语, 2018, 41(3): 2-8.
引用本文: 吴建明. 类型学视角下的“自己”义形式和功能[J]. 外国语, 2018, 41(3): 2-8.
WU Jianming. Forms and Meanings of self: Perspectives from Linguistic Typology[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2018, 41(3): 2-8.
Citation: WU Jianming. Forms and Meanings ofself: Perspectives from Linguistic Typology[J].Journal of Foreign Languages, 2018, 41(3): 2-8.

类型学视角下的“自己”义形式和功能

Forms and Meanings ofself: Perspectives from Linguistic Typology

  • 摘要:以往的研究大多把汉语普通话的"自己"或其它语言中的"自己",定义为"反身代词"或"反身照应语",并在各自理论框架内进行演绎推理。与之不同,本文借助类型学"框架中立"的思想,对跨语言中"自己"义的形式和功能多样性进行考察。我们发现不仅汉语普通话的"自己"呈现多样性分布的格局,世界语言的同类形式也是类型各异,存在个性色彩的形义匹配模式。本文进一步把个体语言中"自己"义的形式和功能集合,称为"自己"义库藏,并通过"库藏结构"的分析法,对汉语普通话的"自己"进行刻画,展示该词汇内部形式和功能的关联对立关系及其层级架构体系,从而避免一些预设范畴给语言描写和比较所带来的困难。

    Abstract:Previous studies generally define Mandarin zijior self-forms in other languages as "reflexive pronouns" or "reflexive anaphors", and within each theoretical framework, deductive reasoning is carried out.Based on the notion of being "framework-neutral" in linguistic typology, this paper explores the diversity of self-forms across languages.It is found that not only the functions of Mandarin zijiare not uniformly distributed, but are the types of self-forms across languages, all of which attest the very existence of language-particular patterns of forms & meaning matches.One step further, this paper proposes that the set of self-forms and meanings within one language constitutes a selfinventory, and by means of the "inventory structure" approach, it reveals the interworkings between the forms and meanings of zijiwith a hierarchical structure.Such an approach is expected to avoid difficulties in language description and comparison, which is typically caused by pre-established categories.

/

    返回文章
    返回