赵春利, 杨才英. 句末助词“嘛”的认知与情感的关联性研究[J]. 外国语, 2016, 39(5): 32-45.
引用本文: 赵春利, 杨才英. 句末助词“嘛”的认知与情感的关联性研究[J]. 外国语, 2016, 39(5): 32-45.
ZHAO Chunli, YANG Caiying. On the Relevance Between Cognition and Emotion of the Sentence-final Particle “ MA”[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2016, 39(5): 32-45.
Citation: ZHAO Chunli, YANG Caiying. On the Relevance Between Cognition and Emotion of the Sentence-final Particle “MA”[J].Journal of Foreign Languages, 2016, 39(5): 32-45.

句末助词“嘛”的认知与情感的关联性研究

On the Relevance Between Cognition and Emotion of the Sentence-final Particle “MA

  • 摘要:本文以语义语法为理论基础,运用双向选择和语义地图的研究方法,对句末助词“嘛”的认知、情感及其关联性进行全面系统的研究。首先,把前人对“嘛”的研究分成四种观点:传统语法的显而易见说、描写语法的应知未知说、功能语法的预设坚持说和生成语法的高程度标记说,并点明前人在理论解释、方法验证和分析描写上的优点和不足;其次,全面分析并验证句末助词“嘛”的句子功能分布图及其语义类型选择图,据此提取出“嘛”的认知意义:主观认知的执意应然性;第三,根据“嘛”的认知意义与内在矛盾,逐一分析“嘛”的四种情感类型:气愤不满意型、急躁不耐烦型、撒娇不遵从型、无谓不在乎型,并基于因果关系和分类关系,构建句末助词“嘛”的认知与情感的语义关联图。

    Abstract:The paper studies the relevance between cognition and emotion of the sentence-final particle " ma(嘛)" based on semantic grammar and bi-optional methodology.First,we classified the previous studies into four groups,"obviousness" of the traditional grammar,"should know but don't know" of the descriptive grammar,"presupposition and insistence" of the functional grammar,and "high-degree marker" of the generative grammar and point out their pros and cons in description,verification and explanation.Second,we analyze the functional distribution of the sentence-final particle " ma" in the sentence and its semantic option and find out that its basic meaning is subjectively cognitive insistence and supposability.Finally,we classify four emotional types of " ma":dissatisfaction with anger,impatience with irritation,disobedience with fondness,and carelessness with casualness.

/

    返回文章
    返回