韩景泉. 汉语显性非宾格动词句的最简分析[J]. 外国语, 2016, 39(6): 12-22.
引用本文: 韩景泉. 汉语显性非宾格动词句的最简分析[J]. 外国语, 2016, 39(6): 12-22.
HAN Jingquan. A Minimalist Analysis of Chinese Surface Unaccusative Structures[J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 2016, 39(6): 12-22.
Citation: HAN Jingquan. A Minimalist Analysis of Chinese Surface Unaccusative Structures[J].Journal of Foreign Languages, 2016, 39(6): 12-22.

汉语显性非宾格动词句的最简分析

A Minimalist Analysis of Chinese Surface Unaccusative Structures

  • 摘要:本文探讨汉语显性非宾格句的主要句法特征与句法结构生成。非宾格动词所选择的名词论元为动词组内补足语位置上原生的内论元。在基于语段的最简句法分析中,位于动词之后的名词内论元与定式时态中心语T-探针形成一致关系,其未取值的语义无解格特征取值为主格。如果被冻结在其基础位置,NP论元充当呈现焦点或无标记句末焦点,便不能再进行移位。非宾格动词之后的焦点化NP论元与非作格动词之后的NP论元存在本质差别。具体来说,前者是保持在其基础生成的VP补足语位置上原位不动,而后者则是将外论元从句法主语(spec-TP)位置右向显性移位进入焦点指示语(spec-FocusP)位置的结果。

    Abstract:This paper deals with the main syntactic properties and syntactic derivation of the surface unaccusative structure in Mandarin Chinese.The selected NP argument of unaccusative verbs originates as the internal argument in VP-complement position.Under a phase-based minimalist syntactic account,the internal NP argument in a postverbal position agrees with the finite T-probe and its unvalued uninterpretable Case feature is valued as nominative.When frozen in its base position,the NP argument serves as presentational focus or unmarked end focus and could not undergo further movement.The focalized postverbal NP argument in structures with unaccusative verbs differs substantially from the postverbal NP argument in structures with unergative verbs.More specifically,the former remains in situ in its base VP-complement position,while the latter is the result of the overt rightward movement of the external argument from spec-TP to spec-FocusP.

/

    返回文章
    返回